Free Download

Clinical effectiveness of house dust mite immunotherapy in mono- versus poly-sensitised patients with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Volume: 0 - Issue: 0

First page: 0 - Last page: 0

J.Y. Kim - D. Hwang - M. Jang - C.S. Rhee - D.H. Han

Selecting an appropriate allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) regimen for polysensitised allergic rhinitis (AR) patients is challenging for clinicians. Although previous studies showed comparable effectiveness of single-allergen AIT with house dust mite (HDM) extract between monosensitised and polysensitised AR patients, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the comparable effectiveness of HDM AIT. In this meta-analysis, we analysed nine studies to compare the clinical effectiveness of HDM AIT. The primary outcome was nasal symptom score and secondary outcomes were medication and quality of life scores. The changes in nasal symptom score after HDM AIT did not significantly differ between monosensitised and polysensitised patients. The clinical effectiveness of HDM AIT regarding medication and quality of life score was not significantly different between monosensitised and polysensitised patients). In conclusion, single-allergen AIT with HDM extract showed comparable clinical effectiveness between polysensitised and monosensitised patients with AR.

J.Y. Kim - D. Hwang - M. Jang - C.S. Rhee - D.H. Han - Clinical effectiveness of house dust mite immunotherapy in mono- versus poly-sensitised patients with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rhinology 0-0: 0-0, 0000

To see the issue content and the abstract you do not have to login

Please login to download the full articles

If you do not have a subscription to Rhinology please consider taking one.

Click here to become a member of the European Rhinologic Society and a subscriber to the journal `RHINOLOGY`, from 2022. Subscription including membership fee: Euro 135.-