<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.8//EN' 'https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd'>
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<PubDate PubStatus='aheadofprint'>
				<Year>2026</Year>
				<Month>06</Month>
				<Day>04</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<ArticleTitle>Impact of real-world confounders on the accuracy of an AI model to support read out of skin prick automated test results</ArticleTitle>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>K.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Roux</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chaker</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.W. </FirstName>
				<LastName>Hellings</LastName><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Affiliation1</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Affiliation2</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>De Greve</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, ZAS Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>V.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hox</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Service d'Otorhinolaryngologie, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Poirrier</LastName>
			<Affiliation>ENT Department, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Daems</LastName><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Affiliation1</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Hippo Dx, Aarschot, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Affiliation 2</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>IDLab, Ghent University-imec, Ghent, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Loeckx</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Hippo Dx, Aarschot, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gorris</LastName><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Affiliation1</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Hippo Dx, Aarschot, Belgium. Affiliation2</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L. </FirstName>
				<LastName>van Gerven</LastName><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Affiliation1</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Affiliation2</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology</Affiliation>
			</AffiliationInfo>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
<PublicationType>Letter</PublicationType>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType='pii'>3472</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType='doi'>10.4193/Rhin25.634</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    	Skin prick testing (SPT) is the gold standard for diagnosing allergic sensitization in individuals with a suspected airborne allergy. Skin tests are used as first option in 90% of individuals suffering from respiratory allergies and almost two-third of all types of allergies. However, its accuracy highly depends on the operator, causing variability during pricking and readout. S.P.A.T. or skin prick automated test standardises the SPT procedure and has been clinically validated.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>