<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.8//EN' 'https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd'>
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<PubDate PubStatus='aheadofprint'>
				<Year>2026</Year>
				<Month>04</Month>
				<Day>02</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<ArticleTitle>Critical appraisal of methodological rigor in a systematic review on post-COVID-19 vaccination-associated olfactory dysfunction</ArticleTitle>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gupta</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of ENT and Head-Neck Surgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, India</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.K.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Verma</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of ENT and Head-Neck Surgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, India</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType='pii'>3405</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType='doi'>10.4193/Rhin25.440</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    	We read with keen interest the article by Kawabata et al. titled “Olfactory disorder after COVID-19 vaccination,” which explores 16 cases of olfactory dysfunction temporally associated with vaccination. The paper addresses an important and under-recognized topic; however, several methodological aspects warrant clarification to aid accurate interpretation.
First, the inclusion of five institutional cases within a review otherwise presented as PRISMA-compliant raises questions regarding methodological consistency. Under PRISMA, all included studies should be identified through transparent and reproducible database searches. Clarifying whether institutional data were processed separately from literature-derived cases would strengthen transparency and avoid confusion about the evidence level.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>