<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.8//EN' 'https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd'>
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<PubDate PubStatus='aheadofprint'>
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>11</Month>
				<Day>30</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<ArticleTitle>Real-world evidence in Rhinology</ArticleTitle>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Reitsma</LastName>
			<Affiliation>ENT Department, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType='pii'>3387</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType='doi'>10.4193/Rhin25.906</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    	When going through the table of contents for this issue of Rhinology, I noticed a few titles containing “real-world” or “real-life”. Real-world evidence, real-life evidence, real-world experience, et cetera, all refer to data obtained from day-to-day practice.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>