<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40855751</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Rhinology and cognition</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>513</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>513</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.J. </FirstName>
				<LastName>Fokkens</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolarynogology and head and neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3347</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.905</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    This issue of our journal starts with an extremely interesting systematic review on the impact of CRS on cognition measured with objective global cognitive function tests like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40619980</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Chronic rhinosinusitis and cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>514</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>522</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Esther Yanxin</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore;Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Benjamin Kye Jyn</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tan</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore;Surgery Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Kai Lin</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chan</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Clara Xin Yi</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chia</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Claire Jing-Wen</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tan</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Brian Sheng Yep</FirstName>
				<LastName>Yeo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Xuandao</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore;Surgery Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Laura</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tay</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Ecosse L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lamoureux</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore;Health Services and System Research Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore;Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Neville Wei Yang</FirstName>
				<LastName>Teo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore;Surgery Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Tze Choong </FirstName>
				<LastName>Charn</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore;Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore;Surgery Academic Clinical Program, SingHealth, Singapore</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3317</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.031</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Recent clinical studies have alluded to an association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and cognition, possibly mediated by local and systemic neuroinflammation. This meta-analysis seeks to clarify the association of CRS diagnosis or treatment with cognitive function and dementia.
Methodology: Two blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies comparing cognitive function (global/domain-specific) or dementia in patients with/without CRS or pre/post-CRS treatment. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I/ROBINS-E. Random-effects models were used to pool the ratio of means (RoM) for cognitive scores and the odds ratio (OR) for dementia.
Results: From 1,149 records, 10 studies encompassing 107,610 patients were included. CRS was associated with poorer global cognitive function compared to healthy. CRS treatment was associated with improvements from baseline in processing speed and working memory. There was no significant cross-sectional association between CRS and dementia.
Conclusion: CRS is associated with 9% poorer global cognitive function, while CRS treatment is associated with 8-9% improvements in processing speed and working memory. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to fully elucidate these relationships.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40720946</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Rhino(septo)plasty Informed Consent. Consensus by the European Rhinoplasty Course Faculty-EUFOREA</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>523</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>533</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hellings</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;Clinical Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Bertossi</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Unit of Maxillo Facial Surgery Head and Neck Department, Universit&#195;  degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cingi</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Eski&#197;Ÿehir Osmangazi University, Eski&#197;Ÿehir/Turkey.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Claeys</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Constantinidis</LastName>
			<Affiliation>1st Academic Otolaryngology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Kiriakidi 1 Str, 546 21, Thessaloniki, Greece. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Conti</LastName>
			<Affiliation>The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium;Escuela de Doctorado UAM, Centro de Estudios de Posgrado, Universidad Aut&#195;³noma de Madrid. Calle Francisco Tom&#195;¡s y Valiente, n&#194;º 2. Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>D'Souza</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Head and Neck, Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon, University Hospital Lewisham, London, United Kingdom.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Declau</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, GZA-ziekenhuizen, Campus Sint-Vincentius, Antwerp, Belgium;Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Foda</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Fokkens</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolarynogology and head/neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gevaert</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gubisch</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Boeheimstrasse 37, 70199, Stuttgart, Germany.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Halewyck</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lekakis</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Regional Hospital Tienen, Flanders, Belgium.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liva</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Mesbahi</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Facial Plastic Surgery Clinic, Fars Province, Shiraz, Iran.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Mcintosh</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Facial Plastic Surgery, Edge Day Hospital, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Nolst Trenit&#195;&#169;</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Jan van Goyen Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>V.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Picavet</LastName>
			<Affiliation>ENT, Praxis f&#195;&#188;r &#195;„sthetik/HNO, Ludwigstrasse 7, Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany;ENT, MVZ Moser Gehrking Sauter und Partner, Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany;ENT Praxis Hasselbacher-Picavet </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Prokopakis</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Robotti</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Plastic Surgery, Villa Sant'Apollonia Private Health Clinic, Bergamo, Lombardia, Italy. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Vandenbroeck</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Regional Hospital Tienen, Flanders, Belgium. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Van Hoolst</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Regional Hospital Leuven, Flanders, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Vansweevelt</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. </Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wagner</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Municipal Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany. K&#195;¶lner Platz 1, 80804 Munich.</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3295</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.204</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Patients seeking rhino(septo)plasty need to be adequately informed by their surgeon or surgical team members about the procedure, the expected outcomes, complication risks and post-operative care, and the available alternatives. A consensus on the content of an informed consent in rhino(septo)plasty is currently lacking despite the high unmet need.
Methodology: The extended international faculty of the European Rhinoplasty Course in Brussels organized by EUFOREA has generated an overview of the current literature on rhinoplasty outcomes and complication rates, and available informed consents. A proposal for informed consent was elaborated, consensus reached and checked for legal validity.
Results: An overview of reported outcomes and complication rates of rhino(septo)plasty are provided. Additionally, contents of existing consent forms for rhino(septo)plasty surgery are compared with requirements found in literature on informed consent, leading to a proposal of informed consent including relevant information according to expert consensus.
Conclusions: An informed consent form for rhino(septo)plasty is proposed by the international faculty of the European Rhinoplasty Course, that might serve rhinoplasty surgeons in the development of their informd consent documents.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40614254</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Current concepts in sinonasal tumors: from pretherapeutic assessment to patient-tailored treatment</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>534</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>542</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Meerwein</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Mauthe</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Soyka</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Holzmann</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3316</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.073</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Managing sinonasal malignancies requires a thorough oncological assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. Patients often present at an advanced tumor stage with a delay in diagnosis. With the recent advancements in imaging techniques along with the growth in molecular testing knowledge, the landscape of these tumors has become increasingly diverse. The pretreatment assessment must include information gathered from radiological and pathological evaluations, as well as intraoperative exploration of the tumors. Only a comprehensive approach allows a personalized treatment plan.
Methodology: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence, encompassing pretherapeutic evaluations and the development of individualized treatment protocols.
Results: Multimodal treatment strategies, including surgical resection, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (for sinonasal mucosal melanoma) need to be tailored based on tumor histology, stage, and patient-specific factors. Endoscopic surgical approaches demonstrated oncologic outcomes comparable to traditional open techniques, with reduced perioperative morbidity. Neoadjuvant therapies facilitated improved local control and organ preservation in advanced-stage tumors.
Conclusion: Ongoing advancements in imaging, surgical interventions, as well as (neo)adjuvant therapies have significantly improved the prognostic landscape of sinonasal malignancies. A multidisciplinary, personalized treatment approach remains pivotal in optimizing patient outcomes.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40728905</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Negative pressure drainage vs. nasal packing after septoplasty: a randomized clinical trial</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>543</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>550</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jiang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Qingdao Caretaker Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Hospital, Qingdao, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Xiao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Shi</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhong</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nursing, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3338</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.112</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Negative pressure drainage is a commonly used method in surgery, but studies applying negative pressure drainage in septoplasty are relatively few.
Methodology: A randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare negative pressure drainage and nasal packing after septoplasty. Patients with nasal septal deviation underwent septoplasty from November 2023 to March 2024 were enrolled. Symptom scores and quality of life scores were assessed on postoperative day 1, day 5, and at 1 month to evaluate postoperative comfort.
Results: A total of 95 patients completed the study, the median (IQR) age was 29 (21, 43) years, and 73 (77%) identified as male. 48 (51%) patients were randomized to nasal packing group and 47 (49%) to negative pressure group. On postoperative day 1, the negative pressure group showed significantly lower symptom scores for nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, olfactory dysfunction, headache, eye discomfort, ear fullness, and better quality of life compared to the packing group. On postoperative day 5, the negative pressure group showed significantly lower scores for olfactory dysfunction and ear fullness compared to the packing group. There was no significant difference in effective rate and postoperative complications rate between negative pressure group and packing group. The cost-effectiveness ratio for the negative pressure group was significantly lower than the packing group.
Conclusions: Negative pressure drainage after septoplasty significantly improves postoperative comfort in the first days after surgery, without affecting surgical efficacy or safety, and helps reduce medical costs.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40587156</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>A prospective cohort study comparing the effects of different middle turbinate treatments on olfactory function recovery in CRSwNP patients after FESS</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>551</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>564</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jian</LastName>
			<Affiliation>E.N.T. Department, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China;Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>E.N.T. Department, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ge</LastName>
			<Affiliation>E.N.T. Department, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Q.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Yang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>E.N.T. Department, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>E.N.T. Department, the 3rd Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China; School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Republic of China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3310</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.320</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: The factors affecting postoperative olfactory recovery in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remain unclear. This study explores postoperative pathological classification and the impact of different middle turbinate management strategies on olfactory recovery. Methodology: Seventy-two CRSwNP patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with &#226;‰&#165;6 months follow-up were classified into eosinophilic (ECRSwNP) and non-eosinophilic (nECRSwNP) groups. Based on middle turbinate management, patients were further divided into resection (partial/complete) and preservation groups. Olfactory scores, clinical characteristics, and nasal endoscopy findings were analyzed, and multifactorial analysis identified factors influencing olfactory recovery. Results: TDI scores in the ECRSwNP group remained lower than those in the nECRSwNP group preoperatively and postoperatively. However, olfactory score improvement and the proportion of significantly improved patients did not differ significantly between the two groups. Middle turbinate management was associated with greater olfactory improvement, particularly in nECRSwNP patients. Although the complete middle turbinate resection group had lower preoperative olfactory scores than the partial resection group, no significant difference was observed in postoperative olfactory improvement between the two approaches.Higher preoperative polyp scores and middle turbinate management predicted olfactory improvement. Conclusions: FESS significantly improves the olfactory function in CRSwNP patients, and the extent of olfactory improvement is independent of pathological type. Patients with higher preoperative Lildholdt polyp scores and those who underwent middle turbinate management during FESS were more likely to exhibit improved olfactory function at 6 months postoperatively.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40587119</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Endoscopic surgery versus conservative treatment in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with nasopharyngeal necrosis</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>565</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>575</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ouyang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Q-L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lin</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A-C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Li</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China; College of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, , China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, , China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J-Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Song</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian province, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R-L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Xie</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3308</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.403</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Nasopharyngeal necrosis is a common sequela after treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the main interventions, endoscopic surgery and conservative therapy, on nasopharyngeal necrosis and identify potential beneficiaries.
Methodology: This retrospective study was conducted on patients with nasopharyngeal necrosis from September 2008 to December 2020 at the Cancer Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. The overall survival (OS) of patients with nasopharyngeal necrosis and their mucosal healing status were assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to balance confounding factors between the two groups.
Results: A total of 517 patients (124 females; 393 males) with nasopharyngeal necrosis were included in this analysis, among whom 287 received conservative therapy and 230 underwent endoscopic surgical treatment. In the unmatched cohort, the endoscopic surgery group had a higher 3-year OS rate than the conservative therapy group. Patients who underwent surgery had higher cure rates than did those who received conservative therapy. PSM and IPTW analyses yielded similar results. Multivariate analyses of the unmatched, PSM, and IPTW cohorts revealed that nasal endoscopic surgery was an independent protective factor for the OS of patients with nasopharyngeal necrosis.
Conclusions: In this retrospective research, endoscopic surgery demonstrated better efficacy than conservative therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with nasopharyngeal necrosis, while conservative therapy may be preferred for patients with superficial mucosal necrosis.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40587220</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Seasonality in the incidence of acute sinusitis, air pollutant levels, and climate</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>576</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>583</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S-H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hung</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Otolaryngology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cheng</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;Institute of Brain Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan;Research Center of Data Science on Healthcare Industry, College of Management, Taipei, Taiwan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H-C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lin</LastName>
			<Affiliation>School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;Research Center of Sleep Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C-S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Research Center of Data Science on Healthcare Industry, College of Management, Taipei, Taiwan;School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;Research Center of Sleep Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Public Finance, Public Finance and Finance Research Center, National Taipei University, Taipei, Taiwan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3311</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.054</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Introduction: Emerging evidence from epidemiological studies highlights the interaction between air quality metrics and sinusitis occurrence. This study investigates the relationship between acute sinusitis incidence, air pollutant levels, and climatic conditions in Taiwan from 2008 to 2017.
Methods: This study extracted outpatient claims data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2010. We computed seasonal incidence rates of acute sinusitis episodes per 1000 population over 120 months, stratifying the data by gender and three age groups: 20-44, 45-64, and 65 years and older. Addressing the seasonal variability inherent in our dataset, we utilized Auto-Regressive Moving Average (ARMA) models to analyze each variable as a univariate time series influenced by its historical values.
Results: The analysis reveals that, except relative humidity, all other climatic factors including CO, NO2, SO2, PM10, O3, ambient temperature and rainfall demonstrated significant crude correlations with the rates of acute sinusitis. The ARIMA test suggested that seasonality plays a significant role in influencing sinusitis episodes across all age groups. Specifically, individuals experience significantly higher incidence rates during winter compared to spring. These findings underscore winter as a period with notably higher incidence rates of acute sinusitis, even after adjusting for meteorological and air pollution variables.
Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive evidence of the significant associations between acute sinusitis incidence, air quality, and climatic factors in Taiwan.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40674772</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Establishing validity of a novel patient-centered and directly measurable definition of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>584</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>590</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>F.A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Houssein</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Sedaghat</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>K.M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Phillips</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology&#226;&#8364;"Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3330</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.378</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND A patient-centered and directly measurable definition for acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) has been developed as &#226;&#8364;œa flare up of symptoms beyond day-to-day variation, lasting at least 3 days, and to which a distinct negative impact on a patient&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s quality of life (QOL) or functionality can be attributed&#226;&#8364;�. Our aim is to understand how this definition correlates with previously used metrics. METHODOLOGY: Cross-sectional study of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients. The number of AECRS (using this novel definition), courses of CRS-related systemic antibiotics and corticosteroids taken for these AECRS, and number of asthma exacerbations in the past 6 months was queried. Disease-specific quality of life was measured using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. RESULTS: A total of 237 CRS patients were enrolled. In the 6-month period prior to study enrollment, the mean number of AECRS was 4.2 while the mean number of systemic antibiotics or corticosteroids taken for these AECRS was 1.6 reflecting patients received rescue medication for 33% of AECRS. The number of AECRS was weakly correlated with number of systemic rescue medications and SNOT-22 score. For asthmatic CRS patients, numbers of AECRS and asthma exacerbations were correlated. Finally, comorbidities were associated with higher AECRS frequency by 29% in migraine and 41% in active tobacco users. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved our aim by showing the AECRS definition correlates with systemic rescue medication usage, disease-specific QOL and asthma exacerbations. Our results demonstrate that indirect measures of AECRS may not capture all AECRS. Furthermore, comorbid migraine and tobacco use are associated with AECRS frequency.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40621839</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Multi-centric real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>591</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>599</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>B&#195;¤rhold</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany;Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital T&#195;&#188;bingen, T&#195;&#188;bingen, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hagemann</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Klimek</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Huber</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gr&#195;¶ger</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Loth</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Medical Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ernst</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Medical Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Beutner</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center G&#195;¶ttingen, G&#195;¶ttingen, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Dombrowski</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Georg-August-University, G&#195;¶ttingen, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>U.</FirstName>
				<LastName>F&#195;¶rster-Ruhrmann</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charit&#195;&#169;-Universit&#195;¤tsmedizin, Berlin, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Olze</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Charit&#195;&#169;-Universit&#195;¤tsmedizin, Berlin, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cuevas</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>N.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gunder</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Malanda</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kiel University, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Laudien</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kiel University, University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Albrecht</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital T&#195;&#188;bingen, T&#195;&#188;bingen, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Matthias</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Becker</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital T&#195;&#188;bingen, T&#195;&#188;bingen, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3319</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.104</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Within the last years, monoclonal antibodies (biologicals) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and significantly improved symptom control in otherwise refractory cases. The effectiveness of the biological mepolizumab, an IL-5 receptor antibody, has not yet been investigated extensively. This multi-centric study assesses its impact on a large German patient cohort including biological na&#195;¯ve and switched patients. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective multi-centric study, patients with the diagnosis of severe CRSwNP treated with mepolizumab by German tertiary referral centers were included. Data were collected retrospectively from patient records. The change from baseline regarding patient reported symptom control, serum biomarkers, nasal polyp score (NPS), and sense of smell were analysed over a course of up to 30 months. RESULTS: 96 patients from 8 tertiary treatment centers were included, 36.5% female, with a mean age of 54.1&#194;&#177;14.3 years. Patient reported outcome measures, smell, and NPS improved significantly within 6 months after treatment initiation or switch from a different biological to mepolizumab. Change from baseline in outcome parameters was smaller in the switch-group, whereas comorbid asthma indicated greater treatment success. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world data show a sustained therapeutic effect of mepolizumab in CRSwNP, including a large proportion of patients who were previously treated with a different biological. This study is the largest real-world cohort to date depicting realistic treatment and disease situations, confirming a broad range of indication for mepolizumab in severe CRSwNP.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40657706</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Antimicrobial activity of simvastatin against chronic rhinosinusitis-related Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro study</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>600</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>607</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Goldie</LastName>
			<Affiliation>School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Department of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lau</LastName>
			<Affiliation>School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H.A.S</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jones</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Harries</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology / Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Walls</LastName>
			<Affiliation>School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Salib</LastName>
			<Affiliation>School of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;Department of Otorhinolaryngology / Head </Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3323</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.023</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), particularly when localised intracellularly, is linked to disease recalcitrance and poor post-surgical outcomes. Antibiotics frequently fail to penetrate the mammalian cell membrane, resulting in an inability to address the intracellular component of S. aureus. This contributes to treatment failure and development of antimicrobial resistance. We investigated the antimicrobial effects of simvastatin, a widely used, inexpensive medication with extracellular and intracellular antimicrobial properties, against CRS-related S. aureus.
METHODS: Simvastatin&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s antimicrobial activity, in prodrug and hydroxy acid forms, was assessed against S. aureus using the broth dilution method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Intracellular activity of simvastatin was evaluated by pre-treating S. aureus-infected LAD2 mast cells with simvastatin and performing colony forming unit (CFU) enumeration and confocal microscopy. Cell viability was assessed using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays.
RESULTS: Simvastatin exhibited an extracellular MIC of 40 mmol/l against S. aureus. Intracellularly, it significantly reduced the bacterial burden by 46-fold in a dose-dependent manner between concentrations of 0.1-100 mmol/l. Toxicity to LAD2 cells was observed at 100 mmol/l. Confocal microscopy revealed a lower percentage of infected cells in the group pretreated with 30 &#206;&#188;mol/l simvastatin (15.3%) compared to untreated cells (32.8%). Simvastatin hydroxy acid demonstrated no antimicrobial activity against S. aureus.
CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin demonstrates in vitro antimicrobial activity against CRS-related S. aureus with the potential for repurposing as a novel antibiotic-sparing topical agent for the treatment of refractory CRS. This could improve surgical outcomes andreduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40657797</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Intranasal trigeminal and secretory functions are impaired after topical anaesthesia or surgical treatment of epistaxis</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>608</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>615</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Vavrina</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hummel</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Interdisciplinary Center Smell and Taste, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.N.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Landis</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Macario</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Soyka</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3325</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.314</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: The sphenopalatine artery (SPA) runs in close proximity to the branches of the trigeminal nerve and to the sympathetic and parasympathetic secretomotor fi bers. In refractory epistaxis, monopolar cautery of the SPA during surgery is of widespread
use. The eff ect of coagulation on adjacent trigeminal and parasympathetic branches, and thus intranasal sensitivity and secretory function, is unknown. METHODS: To investigate intranasal trigeminal function (INTF) by means of CO2 stimuli intranasally, at baseline and after decongestion, before and after local anaesthesia (xylocaine) in healthy subjects and after monopolar cautery in patients treated for refractory epistaxis. In the latter, INTF and secretory function were tested by comparing the treated with the untreated side. Nasal and lacrimal secretions were measured with intranasal sponges and Schirmer&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s tests. SETTING: Monocentric cohort study in tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: A total of 37 healthy participants and 17 patients were included. Nasal decongestion had no eff ect on CO2 measurements, whereas local anaesthesia signifi cantly decreased INTF in healthy subjects. In patients, the operated side showed signifi cantly lower INTF, lower nasal secretory function but no signifi cant changes in lacrimal function.CONCLUSION: Local anaesthesia and surgical treatments have measurable eff ects on INTF. Monopolar cautery of the SPA and its branches aff ects nasal secretory function. These eff ects may lead to symptoms and surgeons should be aware of the potential harm in epistaxis treatments.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40820310</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>The NSUN2-YBX1 axis enhances 5-Methylcytosine modification to facilitate NPM1-mediated nuclear translocation of PKM2, augmenting the Warburg effect and promoting nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression in a mouse model</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>616</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>627</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Z.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Guo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhou</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Thyroid Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3332</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin24.496</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is notable not only for its distinct geographic and ethnic distribution but also for its metabolic alterations. A key feature of NPC is its reliance on aerobic glycolysis for energy production. This shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis provides cancer cells with a metabolic advantage, supporting rapid growth and survival. Targeting aerobic glycolysis has therefore emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. 
Methods: RT-qPCR, Western blot, IHC, and IF staining were used to examine gene and protein expression levels. Cell viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion were measured using the CCK-8 assay, colony formation assay, and transwell assay, respectively. Interactions among NPM1, PKM2, NSUN2, and YBX1 were examined using RIP, Co-IP, MeRIP, RNA pulldown, and dual-luciferase reporter assays. Aerobic glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) levels were analyzed using the XF96 metabolic analyzer. Additionally, an in vivo mouse model of NPC was established for further validation. 
Results: NPM1 was abnormally elevated in NPC tissues and cells. Silencing of NPM1 inhibited aerobic glycolysis, suppressed NPC progression and metastasis, and reduced PKM2 nuclear translocation. Mechanistically, NPM1 physically interacted with PKM2 to promote its nuclear localization, while the NSUN2/YBX1 axis upregulated NPM1 expression through m5C modification, stabilizing NPM1 mRNA. 
Conclusion: The NSUN2-YBX1 axis induces m5C modification of NPM1, leading to increased NPM1 stability and its expression. This upregulation facilitates the nuclear translocation of PKM2, which promotes aerobic glycolysis and drives the proliferation and metastasis of NPC. These findings highlight the potential of targeting NPM1 as a novel therapeutic approach for NPC.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40820301</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>ITGAM and FCGR3B contribute to recurrent and limited CRSwNP in children through phagosome pathway</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>628</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>638</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Xiao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>N.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pathology, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Centre for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jia</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pathology, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Centre for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wei</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Clinical Research Center, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Beijing Engineering Research Center of Pediatric Surgery, Engineering and Transformation Center, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Yao</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pathology, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Centre for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pathology, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Centre for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>T.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Yang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ge</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory for Pediatric Diseases of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Childrens Hospital</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Han</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Childrens Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Childrens Health, Beijing, China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3334</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.035</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is more common in children with limited CRSwNP (L-CRSwNP). L-CRSwNP shares similar clinical phenotypes with recurrent CRSwNP (R-CRSwNP). This study aimed to explore the molecular mechanisms of L- and R-CRSwNP in children.
Methodology: Compared clinical characteristics and RNA sequencing data of 20 L-CRSwNP and 5 R-CRSwNP in children. Paired analyzed RNA sequencing data of 6 children with L-CRSwNP polyps and mucosal tissue samples. Conducted GO and KEGG enrichment analyses. Identified hub genes through protein-protein interaction networks (PPI). Validated hub genes in L- and R-CRSwNP using real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). 
Results: RNA-seq analysis of L- and R-CRSwNP polyp showed no differentially expressed genes (DEGs). RNA-seq paired analysis of L-CRSwNP identified 1419 DEGs. GO enrichment analysis showed significant enrichment for biological processes associated with neutrophils. ITGAM and FCGR3B were identified as hub genes by PPI analysis. RT-qPCR and IHC results suggested the expression levels of ITGAM and FCGR3B were significantly increased in L- and R-CRSwNP. mIHC results suggested ITGAM and FCGR3B were closely associated with neutrophils and M2 macrophages in L- and R-CRSwNP. 
Conclusions: L- and R-CRSwNP in children exhibit similar clinical phenotypes and molecular mechanisms. ITGAM and FCGR3B are hub genes contributing to disease through neutrophil- and M2 macrophage-mediated phagosome pathway. 
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40587092</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Comment to the article "Comparison of outcomes for Draf IIB vs Draf III in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis"</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>639</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>639</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kacprzyk</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Krak&#195;³w, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>G&#197;‚owacki</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Krak&#195;³w, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3309</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.171</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    We read with great interest the article by Hirayama et al. (1) and commend the authors on their comprehensive work, which presents an extensive dataset accompanied by robust statistical analyses and a detailed systematic review. This study is undoubtedly a significant contribution to the literature on frontal sinus surgery.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>63</Volume>
			<Issue>5</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2025</Year>
				<Month>10</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">40587092</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Response to: Comment to the article "Comparison of outcomes for Draf IIB vs Draf III in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis"</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>640</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>640</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Shahid</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Aga Khan University, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hirayama</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Iftikhar</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Northamptonshire, Cliftonville, Northampton, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3320</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin25.233</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    We thank our readers for their interest in our work and their thoughtful comments. We concur with the concerns raised regarding the heterogeneity of the included studies, which we have openly acknowledged and discussed in the limitations section of our review.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>