<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">37283455</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Global CRSwNP Awareness Day and the European Society meeting in Sofia</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>193</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>193</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Fokkens</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3084</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin23-903</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36999780</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>EPOS/EUFOREA update on indication and evaluation of Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps 2023</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>194</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>202</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W.J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Fokkens</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy - IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Rozzano (MI), ItalyPersonalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy - IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Rozzano (MI), Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A-S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Viskens</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>V.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Backer</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of ENT, head and neck surgery and audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Conti</LastName>
			<Affiliation>The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
				<LastName>De Corso</LastName>
			<Affiliation>The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gevaert</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.K.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Scadding</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Allergy and Rhinology, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wagemann</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universit&#195;¤tsklinikum D&#195;&#188;sseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Bernal-Sprekelsen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, hospital clinic Barcelona, Spain</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chaker</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology and Center for Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Heffler</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy - IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Rozzano (MI), Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences - Humanitas University - Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.K.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Han</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>E.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Van Staeyen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hopkins</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Guys and St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Mullol</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Cl&#195;­nic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERES. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Peters</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Reitsma</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Senior</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hellings</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases Scientific Expert Team Members, Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Bel</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3069</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.489</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a debilitating disease with a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL). It is typically characterized by a type 2 inflammatory reaction and by comorbidities such as asthma, allergies and NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD). Here, the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway diseases discusses practical guidelines for patients on biologic treatment. Criteria for the selection of patients who would benefit from biologics were updated. Guidelines are proposed concerning the monitoring of the drug effects that provide recognition of responders to the therapy and, subsequently, the decision about continuation, switching or discontinuation of a biologic. Furthermore, gaps in the current knowledge and unmet needs were discussed.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36946589</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: real-life retrospective 12-month effectiveness data</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>203</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>213</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>B&#195;¶scke</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of L&#195;&#188;beck, L&#195;&#188;beck, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Heidemann</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of L&#195;&#188;beck, L&#195;&#188;beck, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>K-L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Bruchhage</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of L&#195;&#188;beck, L&#195;&#188;beck, Germany</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3068</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.469</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, an IL-4/13 receptor inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
METHODOLOGY: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for CRSwNP based on retrospective 12-month follow-up data of 41 patients. We analysed nasal endoscopy scores, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), 12-item Sniffin&#226;&#8364;&#8482;-Sticks odor identification test (SSIT-12), total serum IgE, serum Eosinophilic Cationic Protein (ECP), and total blood eosinophil count (BEC). We performed statistical analysis using non-parametric ANOVA-type models and Spearman&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s correlation.
RESULTS: At month 1, endoscopy scores, PROMs and SSIT-12 showed meaningful improvements that were maintained until month 12. Initial elevations in both median ECP and BECs returned to near baseline levels by month 12. The percentage of patients withBEC &#226;‰&#165;0.6 remained increased at month 12 (42.1%) compared to baseline (19.5%). Total serum IgE levels decreased progressively and correlated with nasal polyp scores at month 12. &#226;&#8364;œAdequate response&#226;&#8364; was reached in 86.8% of our cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that dupilumab is effective for the treatment of CRSwNP. The potential for short- and long-term BEC elevations in some CRSwNP patients should be carefully monitored.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36715355</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Chronic rhinitis and stress: the possible culprits of midfacial segment pain</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>214</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>220</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Joo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H-J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cho</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Jeon</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kim</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Disease Center, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S-W.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kim</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3054</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.305</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Bilateral symmetrical pain in the midfacial region without evidence of sinonasal disease is termed midfacial segment pain (MSP), about which little is known. The present study explored the prevalence of facial pain and the risk factors for MSP.
METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Those who reported facial pain or pressure lasting at least three months with no evidence of a sinonasal disease on nasal endoscopy were considered to have MSP. The participants were categorised according to the presence of facial pain and chronic rhinosinusitis. Basic demographic data and medical conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, were compared between subject groups. We also evaluated psychological stress, depressive episodes, and suicidal thoughts, as well as physician-diagnosed nasal diseases, including chronic rhinitis and symptomatic nasal septal deviation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for MSP.
RESULTS: Of 31,999 participants, the prevalence of facial pain was 0.59%. A total of 58 (0.18%) respondents had MSP, of whom 40 (73.5%) were female. On univariate analysis, female sex, chronic rhinitis, and psychological stress were more prevalent in the subjects with MSP than the control subjects. However, in the multivariate analysis, only chronic rhinitis and psychological stress remained significant, while the female sex exhibited only marginal significance.
CONCLUSION: Chronic rhinitis and psychological stress may be significant risk factors for MSP.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">37283512</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Ultra-low-dose CBCT: new cornerstone of paranasal sinus imaging</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>221</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>230</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tamminen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology &#226;&#8364;" Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Satasairaala, Pori, Finland; Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>J&#195;¤rnstedt</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Radiology Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Numminen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology &#226;&#8364;" Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lehtinen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Radiology Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Lehtim&#195;¤ki</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Rautiainen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology &#226;&#8364;" Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>I.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kivek&#195;¤s</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology &#226;&#8364;" Head and Neck Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3085</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.385</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Background: This study evaluates the clinical image quality (IQ) and usability of a sinonasal ultra-low-dose (ULD) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. The results are compared to those of a high resolution (HR) CBCT scan to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a ULD CBCT protocol.
Methodology: Sixty-six anatomical sites in 33 subjects were imaged twice using two imaging modalities: HR CBCT (Scanora 3Dx scanner; Soredex, Tuusula, Finland) and ULD CBCT (Promax 3D Mid scanner; Plandent, Helsinki, Finland). IQ, opacification and obstruction, structural features and operative usability were assessed.
Results: The overall IQ in subjects with &#226;&#8364;œno or minor opacification&#226;&#8364; was excellent: 100% (HR CBCT) and 99% (ULD CBCT) of ratings were evaluated as sufficient for every structure. Increased opacification reduced the quality of both imaging modalities, resulting
conchtoethmoidectomy, frontal sinusotomy, sphenotomy and posterior ethmoidectomy in cases with greater opacification.
Conclusions: IQ of paranasal ULD CBCT is sufficient for clinical diagnostics and should be considered for surgical planning. We recommend it as the primary imaging protocol for all patients who meet imaging criteria due to recurrent or chronic nasal symptoms. Additional or conventional imaging might be needed for patients with extensive chronic rhinosinusitis and/or indications of frontal sinus involvement.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36730816</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Temporal evolution of quality of life in patients endoscopically treated for sinonasal malignant tumors</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>231</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>245</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Maggiore</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Fancello</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gasparini</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Locatello</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli  Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Orlando</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chieca</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention, and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Caini</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention, and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>C.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Becherini</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Bonomo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>O.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Gallo</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Italy</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3058</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.367</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to assess which factors may affect the quality of life (QoL) and its fluctuation over time in adult patients who received endonasal endoscopic oncologic sinus surgery (EOSS) for sinonasal malignancies (SNM) in our center.
METHODOLOGY: We analyzed EOSS cases for primary SNM from January 2015 to June 2020. For each patient, we have recorded the age at treatment, gender, smoking habits, use of psychotropic drugs for mood disorders, stage, histotype, type of surgical resection, need for skull-base reconstruction, development of postoperative major complications, and the use of adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We evaluated the patient's performance status pre-treatment using the ECOG scale. Quality of life was measured using three questionnaires (SNOT-22; ASK-9; EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3).
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in our study, of whom thirty-two (58.18%) received adjuvant IMRT. Overall, a significant improvement in all QoL outcomes was observed at eighteen months, while, female sex, higher ECOG scores, advanced stage of disease, and adjuvant IMRT were associated with worse QoL. After 18 months the delta in QoL between women and men worsened (in SNOT-22 and EORTC QLQ-GLOBAL) while if only the most fragile patients according to ECOG are considered, this difference was reduced for both tools.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed that IMRT is the element that has the greatest impact on patient's quality of life, in association with the female sex, ECOG &#38;gt;2, and advanced stage of the disease.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36715464</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Stent pretreatment for internal carotid artery exposed to necrotic lesions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>246</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>254</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W-B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X-B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zhang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Neurosurgery, The third affiliated hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Liu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Zou</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>You</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Xie</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>X-T</FirstName>
				<LastName>Duan</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>H-F.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Li</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>K.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Wen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Peng</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y-J.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hua</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P-Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Huang</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>R.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Sun</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J-H.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Neurosurgery, The third affiliated hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, P. R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M-Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Chen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, P.R. China</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3056</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.451</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Post radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) invading the internal carotid artery (ICA) contributes to the death of 69.2&#226;&#8364;"72.7% of PRNN patients. ICA occlusion is an effective treatment to avoid fatal bleeding, while some patients are intolerant. We present a novel method that allows for these patients without interrupting blood flow through the ICA.
METHODOLOGY: This study enrolled patients with PRNN-invaded ICA who were not suitable for ICA occlusion from April 2020 to November 2022. ICA stent pretreatment was performed in the 36 patients and followed the endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) or conservative treatment for PRNN. We report the survival outcome and incidence of complications after stent implantation and compare the survival outcomes of ENPG and conservative treatment for PRNN followed by stent implantation.
RESULTS: ICA stent pretreatment was performed in the 36 enrolled patients, among which 14 underwent ENPG, and 22 received conservative treatment. 27.8% patients died after a median follow-up of 15 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival were higher in the ENPG group than in the conservative treatment group. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was significantly higher in the ENPG group than in the non-ENPG group.
CONCLUSIONS: The innovative application of ICA stents is a promising treatment to improve outcomes in patients with PRNN invading the ICA who are unsuitable for ICA embolization, especially when followed by endoscopic surgery. However, methods to avoid postoperative cerebral ischemia and nasopharyngeal hemorrhage still require further study.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36912244</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Peak nasal inspiratory flow in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>255</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>262</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>W. M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Thorstensen</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Olavs University hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Rystad &#195;˜ie</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Olavs University hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Sue-Chu</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Thoracic Medicine, St. Olavs University hospital, Trondheim, Norway</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Karmhus Steinsv&#195;&#165;g</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, S&#195;¸rlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway; Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A-S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Helvik</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Olavs University hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3063</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.316</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: The nasal airflow in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is poorly characterized. Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) is a valuable instrument for assessing nasal airflow and the effect of pulmonary pathology such as COPD on PNIF remains unknown. To test the hypothesis that nasal airflow is reduced in COPD, we assessed airflow using PNIF in COPD and a control group. We also explored whether there is an association between COPD, chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and other predefined covariates with PNIF.
METHODOLOGY: Ninety patients with COPD and 67 controls underwent PNIF and spirometry. The associations between PNIF and COPD and pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (% predicted) were assessed by multivariable linear regression in two separate models.
RESULTS: PNIF was significantly lower in the COPD group than in the control group. Multivariable linear regression showed that COPD and pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted) were significantly associated with lower PNIF after adjustment for age, sex, CRSsNP, weight and height. CRSsNP was not associated with PNIF in either of the adjusted regression analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: PNIF is lower in COPD than in a control group. The finding of a low PNIF in the absence of disease in the upper airways may be due to obstructive lower airways diseases and special care should be taken when interpreting PNIF values in patients with COPD or reduced FEV1
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36891983</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>TRIM27 expression is associated with poor prognosis in sinonasal mucosal melanoma</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>263</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>271</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kimura</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Suzuki</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Y.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Nakamaru</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Kano</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Watanabe</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Honma</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Nakazono</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>N.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Tsushima</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Hatakeyama</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Homma</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3062</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.405</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Tripartite motif-containing 27 (TRIM27) has been implicated in the progression of various cancers. However, the role of TRIM27 in sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) remains poorly understood.
MATERIALS &#38; METHODS: We retrospectively examined 28 patients with SNMM treated with between 2003 and 2021. We undertook immunohistochemical analysis of TRIM27, Ki-67, and p-Akt1 expression in SNMM tissues. We also investigated the relationship between TRIM27 expression and clinical characteristics, prognosis, Ki-67 as a tumor growth potential marker, and p-Akt1 as one of the prognostic factors in mucosal melanoma.
RESULTS: TRIM27 expression was significantly higher in T4 disease than in T3 disease and was higher in stage IV than in stage III. Patients with high-TRIM27 SNMM had a significantly poorer prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival.There was also a significantly higher rate of distant metastasis. Univariate analysis for OS revealed that TRIM27 and T classification were significant poor prognostic factors. In addition, the Ki-67 positive score and the p-Akt1 total staining score were significantly higher in the high-TRIM27 group than in the low-TRIM27 group.
CONCLUSIONS: High TRIM27 expression in SNMM was associated with advanced T classification, poor prognosis and distant metastasis. We suggest that TRIM27 has potential as a novel biomarker for prognosis in SNMM.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36946425</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>The association between allergic rhinitis and airway dysfunction and nasal endothelial damage and oxidative stress</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>272</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>282</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>Z.G.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Koksal</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Aydin Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, T&#195;&#188;rkiye</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>P.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Uysal</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Aydin Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, T&#195;&#188;rkiye</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>O.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Erdogan</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Basic Science, Medical Biochemistry, Aydin Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, T&#195;&#188;rkiye</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>O.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Cevik</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Department of Basic Science, Medical Biochemistry, Aydin Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Medicine, Aydin, T&#195;&#188;rkiye</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3065</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.484</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    BACKGROUND: Although lower airway hyperresponsiveness is present in approximately one in three patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), the underlying mechanism remains unclear. To evaluate nasal patency and pulmonary functions in AR independently of the presence of asthma and to investigate the relationships between these and nasal oxidative stress parameters and endothelial damage.
METHODOLOGY: Seventy adolescents with AR (AR group - 27 with asthma and 43 without asthma) and 30 healthy controls (HC group) were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Endocan and oxidative biomarkers [total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), and oxidative stress index (OSI)] in nasal lavage fluid specimens; peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF); fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and impulse oscillometry (zR5, zR20, and R5-20 for resistance and zX5 and zX20 for reactance) were investigated.
RESULTS: Nasal endocan, TOS, and OSI values were higher in the AR group and TAS in the HC group. There was no difference between AR groups with and without asthma in terms of nasal endocan and oxidative biomarkers. FeNO levels and airway resistance (zR5, zR20, and R5-20) were higher in the AR group than in the HC group. However, there was no difference between the groups in PNIF. X5 was higher among the AR without asthma than in the other groups. Correlation between OSI and R5-20 was observed in the AR group. In the linear regression model, (logged) OSI was significantly predicted (logged) R5-20.
CONCLUSIONS: The airways of adolescents with AR without asthma were as much affected as those of the AR with asthma, and this effect was associated with nasal endothelial damage and an increase in oxidative stress.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36946510</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Biologicals in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: translation to clinical practice while waiting for head-to-head studies</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>283</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>286</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>J.L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Boechat</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Clinical Immunology Service, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niter&#195;³i/RJ, Brazil; Basic and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Sousa-Pinto</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; MEDCIDS &#226;&#8364;" Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>L.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Delgado</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Basic and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal;Servi&#195;§o de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar de S&#195;&#163;o Jo&#195;&#163;o, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>D.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Silva</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Basic and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Servi&#195;§o de Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar de S&#195;&#163;o Jo&#195;&#163;o, E.P.E., Porto, Portugal; EPIUnit - Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3066</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.436</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) affects 1.0-2.6% of the population (1) and results in relevant direct and indirect costs. Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with Type 2-targeting biologicals (anti-IL4R&#206;&#177;, anti-IL5R, anti-IL5 and anti-IgE) opened a new treatment field for patients refractory to first-line treatments (2,3).
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
	<Article>
		<Journal>
			<PublisherName>International Rhinologic Society</PublisherName>
			<JournalTitle>Rhinology</JournalTitle>
			<Issn>0300-0729</Issn>
			<Volume>61</Volume>
			<Issue>3</Issue>
			<PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
				<Year>2023</Year>
				<Month>6</Month>
				<Day>1</Day>
			</PubDate>
		</Journal>
		<Replaces IdType="pubmed">36912435</Replaces>
		<ArticleTitle>Local allergic rhinitis in children</ArticleTitle>
		<FirstPage>287</FirstPage>
		<LastPage>288</LastPage>
		<Language>EN</Language>
		<AuthorList>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>A.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Bo&#197;&#188;ek</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>B.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Ignasiak</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Allergy Outaptient Clinic, Katowice, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Krupka</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
			<Author>
				<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
				<LastName>Miodonska</LastName>
			<Affiliation>Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland</Affiliation>
			</Author>
		</AuthorList>
		<ArticleIdList>
			<ArticleId IdType="pii">3064</ArticleId>
			<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.4193/Rhin22.474</ArticleId>
		</ArticleIdList>
		<Abstract>
	    Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is one of the endotypes of rhinitis. Despite much data about epidemiology diagnosis and treatment in adult patients with LAR, there is little information on children. Many studies indicate the need for such an assessment of the phenomenon in children, which results in one meta-analysis based on young patients selected from cohorts of patients of different ages.
		</Abstract>
	</Article>
</ArticleSet>